@rirzce ("Edward 20 del’urfi legislature and Forwarded to England for the royal assent, but were disallowed or never again heard of. Delegations sent to the Old Country were not even given a hearing; and proceedings for the forfeiture of several estates under a court of escheat, which was established in 1818, were stopped by order of the Crown, and all claim to forfeiture relinquished. At every general election the settlement of the question was made a live issue, only to sink into oblivion when the contest was over. The British government did, indeed, about 1840, assume payment of the civil list, and ordered that the quit rents be enforced, but the payments were never made. The proprietors not only secured the disallowance of every act passed by the Island legislature to remedy the grievance, but procured as well an abatement in quit rents duethe Crown. The latter action, however, proved beneficial, as it enabled some of the estates against which were heavy charges, to be sold to parties who endeavoured to bring in settlers—a notable instance being the Selkirk estate. In 1860 a com- mission invested with powers to settle all matters in dispute between landlord and tenant, was appointed, sat, and made an award ; but upon a technicality raised by the proprietors regarding the manner in which estates should be valued, the award was laid aside. Then began again the contest between the people and landlordism. The failure of the commission almost drove the colonists into a state of rebellion. The “Tenant League’ the yeomanry of Queen’s County, better known as the “ Posse Comitatus,” were called out to suppress the demonstrations. ’ was formed, meetings were held, and Affairs remained in sfatu gun until 1875, after the union of the Island with Canada, when a sum of $800,000 (under the terms of union) was placed at the service of the Island government for the purchase of the proprietors’ estates. After the appoint- ment of a commission under the “ Land Purchase Act,1875,” for the purpose of making the awards, the difiiculty was finally disposed of. This question has now become a thing of the past, absentee proprietorship has been abolished, and